New York Law (NYLE) Practice Exam 2026 - Free NYLE Practice Questions and Study Guide

Question: 1 / 400

Was the prosecution's disclosure to Oscar timely after his arraignment?

Yes, because the disclosure occurred less than 35 days after the defendant's arraignment.

Yes, because disclosure may occur at any time before a certificate of compliance is filed.

No, because the disclosure occurred more than 20 days after the defendant's arraignment.

The correct answer is based on the timeline set forth by New York law regarding the prosecution's obligation to disclose evidence to the defendant. Under New York Criminal Procedure Law, the prosecution is required to provide certain disclosures within specific timeframes following a defendant's arraignment. In this case, the law stipulates that disclosures must occur within 20 days after arraignment.

The assertion that the prosecution’s disclosure occurred more than 20 days after Oscar's arraignment directly indicates that the timing was not in compliance with the legal requirements. This highlights the importance of adhering to the statutory timelines to ensure that defendants are adequately informed of the evidence against them and can prepare an effective defense.

Options suggesting that disclosure may occur before a certificate of compliance is filed or suggesting that it can happen at any time before certain deadlines overlook the necessity of the initial mandated timetable post-arraignment for timely disclosure. These timelines exist to protect defendants’ rights and ensure fairness in the criminal justice process. Therefore, when the disclosure extends beyond the legally established 20-day period, it is deemed untimely.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

No, because disclosure must occur at the time of arraignment.

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy